Nothing beats drama, unless of course it's good internet drama, or better still, good internet drama by rabid Twilight fans.
So here's the deal, after Breaking Dawn's release one week ago the camps have been split in two:
The Breaking Fails v/s The OMGBreakingDawnisthebomb!
Basically, you either love it or hate it. Sure there is middle ground but it's pretty sparse in comparison. I've been browsing (and partaking) in some heated debates on the Amazon.com threads and it gets as hot as a june bride bareback on a hot stove. Many people are passionate about the books, stating (as I have):
Twilight is a Trilogy
Many wish Breaking Down, excuse me, Breaking Dawn never existed. And then it got ugly. The Twilight Lexicon which is a base for fans to meet and discuss the books has rewritten it's "manifesto". It contains juicy nuggets like this:
1. The Twilight Saga is comprised of four books. It is not a trilogy. You may have wished that the books stopped at three, but they didn’t, and this site is a fan site for all the books in the Twilight Saga. We firmly stand by the canon as established in all four books. It all really happened. If you want to pretend Breaking Dawn never happened, that’s fine, but on this website there are no banners, avatars, sigs to that effect, and discussion acknowledges and concedes that all events contained in the four volume series exists. Denial of canon has no place on this website.
It's would be idiotic if it weren't so damned funny.
Here's a thread about it: Fails So Bad
1 comments:
That's too funny. Tempting, but I'm not going to get involved in this firestorm!
Post a Comment